SECOND-CONVERSATIONS

From Knowledge Federation
Revision as of 16:13, 25 November 2023 by Dino (talk | contribs) (Created page with "<div class="page-header" ><h1>Federation through Action</h1> </div> <div class="row"> <div class="col-md-3"></div> <div class="col-md-7"><p>We are "culturally unprepared" to...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

We are "culturally unprepared" to even understand our new position, Aurelio Peccei warned. When proper light has been turned on and our "new position" is clearly seen and comprehended, it will be clear that we have but one urgent task to attend on—and ten thousand distractions:

We must urgently empower our next generation to create a different world.

The key practical question that remains is how to go about doing that.

In 1999 The Economist issued a challenge—to write a short essay describing what the world would be like in 2050; I gave my contribution the title "World in the year 2000". Nobody can predict what the world would be like in the year 2050, I explained; but the answer will crucially depend on how we see the world and how we act now. I then pointed to the warnings that our current trends are not sustainable; that we are headed towards a systemic collapse; and concluded with a call to action—to create an embryo of a whole new order of things or paradigm; no matter how small; because our future and especially our children's lives and livelihoods will be crucially different depending on whether the dissolution of the present paradigm is conceived as a construction or a new one—or not.

The holotopia initiative is a practical implementation of this proposal.

This two-step call to action I am about to propose has been designed as a way to put the ball in play; to enable the impending paradigm to change.

Ignite holotopia dialog.

As a practical way to change our collective mind; by first of all changing our mindset (which compels us to create "the huge problems now confronting us", while we try to resolve them); and then changing the way in which we communicate—and by elevating us above "the world" and "the information jungle", foster (the collective mind that will give us) the kind of awareness we the people now vitally need.

The Liberation book has that as function—to ignite the dialog; by providing an initial prototype of new thinking, and of the future vision alias holotopia.

The dialog will ignite the self-organization; it will elevate us jointly to a level (on the metaphorical mountain, above 'information jungle') from where we can clearly see what must be done; and then self-organize further, by creating prototypes.

The dialog is holotopia's new collective mind; which will organize us to be creative in the manner our situation demands. The dialog is also the media-enabled communication channel that will provide us awareness. It is by the dialog that the media content on this entirely new news channel will be created.

I have prepared several scenarios how and where these dialogs will begin; I hold back from telling you about them—the important point being that the dialog will continuously recreate itself; by producing newer—and more daring, more to the point, more distinctly functional (ways to produce) knowledge (together).

Institute knowledge federation.

As academia's—and society's—evolutionary organ.

And as a practical way to to empower our next generation—and the next-generation scientists or academic researchers in particular—to be creative in ways that their situation demands; and in particular and more concretely—to re-create the systems in which we live in work, instead of learning how to fit in and compete within their confines.

By instituting knowledge federation we'll also play the strongest card we have in our hands, act upon the "systemic leverage point" that we control when confronting the power structure—the information; the university's prerogative to tell the world what the information needs to be like; and on a more fundamental level—to provide a new, federated epistemology and methodology for creating truth and meaning.

This can be done in a number of ways; but the concrete way, which is already in implementation is to institute the knowledge federation at the Inter University Center Dubrovnik under the patronage of the World Academy of Art and Science. The IUC has the world's leading universities as members; their students can take the IUC courses for credit, with the consent of their departments. Ands the WAAS is an academic organization whose members do not distinguish themselves by "academic productivity"—but by making a difference in the world.

The idea now is to launch the Collaborology course as an instance of the game-changing game; where the WAAS members will (act as Z-players and) empower the international students and entrepreneurs (as A-players) to re-create "the world".