Difference between revisions of "Reflection about the future of innovation"

From Knowledge Federation
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<p></p>
 
<p></p>
 
<p>The above [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] resulted when we asked our communication design team to create a way to help people see themselves as part of a system. And become aware how much the structure of that system <em>determines</em> both the quality of their lives and the effects and the value of their work. The original version of this image was animated. </p>
 
<p>The above [[ideograms|<em>ideogram</em>]] resulted when we asked our communication design team to create a way to help people see themselves as part of a system. And become aware how much the structure of that system <em>determines</em> both the quality of their lives and the effects and the value of their work. The original version of this image was animated. </p>
<p> So imagine a [[system|<em>system</em>]] as a large machine, comprising technology <em>and</em> people. Think of its role as taking everyone's daily work as input, and producing socially useful results as output. How well is it performing in this all-important task? How suitable is its structure? How much could its performance be improved by modifying its structure?</p>
+
<p>Imagine our [[system|<em>systems</em>]] as gigantic machines, combining people with technology. Think of them as taking everyone's daily work as input, and producing socially useful results. How well are they performing this task? How suitable is their structure?</p>
<p>Take a look at your smartphone, and think about the fascinating amount of technological dexterity that has been packed into such a tiny thing. Then take a look at those much larger things, and consider the much <em>more</em> fascinating neglect by which those 'mega-machines' have been treated.</p>
+
<p>Take a look at your smartphone, and consider the technical dexterity it embodies. Compare it with the neglect with which those incomparably larger, and incomparably more important "machines" have been treated. </p>
<p>How could this be possible?</p></div>
 
 
</div>
 
</div>

Latest revision as of 16:50, 22 December 2018

The system is us

System.jpeg

System ideogram

The above ideogram resulted when we asked our communication design team to create a way to help people see themselves as part of a system. And become aware how much the structure of that system determines both the quality of their lives and the effects and the value of their work. The original version of this image was animated.

Imagine our systems as gigantic machines, combining people with technology. Think of them as taking everyone's daily work as input, and producing socially useful results. How well are they performing this task? How suitable is their structure?

Take a look at your smartphone, and consider the technical dexterity it embodies. Compare it with the neglect with which those incomparably larger, and incomparably more important "machines" have been treated.